topps lineage didn't do much for me. i prefer my retired dodgers in sets of their own, i suppose. like topps' aptly named 2003 release, topps retired. i believe there are rules today against sets like that, but back then i could revel in my retired dodgers, including steve garvey as 'not a padre'. i am certain i have the garvey from the set, and likely a couple of the parallels, but i am not sure that i have the maury wills or the tom lasorda. i do have the other dodgers, including ron cey
that's an early photo of the penguin in vero beach used for the primary shot on the card. the inset is from a few years later with his mustache in full force.here's don sutton
whose photos are both early in the career images. it's odd to see sutton without his hat on a baseball card, but i suppose topps had pretty much every player doff the cap just in case they were traded back then. i can't imagine al campanis giving up on sutton in the late 60s or early 70s.
here's johnny podres
as he exits a penitentiary, apparently. i would guess the big photo is from the late 50s, while the inset is from circa 1965.
i also picked up the podres auto a few months ago
players like podres look funny in chrome. i don't think it was meant to be for players of his era.
and then there is don newcombe
i love that he was included in the set, but sad to see him as a redleg. apparently, topps only had the one photo of him from his time in cincy. still, it's nice to see newk in a modern set, and i am sure there were some reds collectors who were pleased to not get another tony perez card. actually, perez was a red in this set, too. but you get the idea.
What a sweet set. I'll have to look into any Angels in there.
ReplyDeleteAngels in Order, the only Angel I have from it is Nolan Ryan. It's nice picture, but like rest of set, it's a posed windup and not a live in game shot.
ReplyDeleteoh, there's also a Jimmy Piersall as an Angel, but I have only seen it, don't own it.
ReplyDelete